“Just wanted to share with you an update on a court case I was following and had foolishly some hopes for.
Unless European courts stand for something (big lawsuit in Swiss is in the making) for me it’s once again (fool me a million times) blatantly obvious that we won’t get any justice through our courts. I’ve been trying to stay optimistic and hoping for some humans residing in the courts.” – anwn
Update October 28, 2022
Rehearing requested with review of Justices’ potential conflicts of interest with vaccine developers
Outcome. Rather than atone for Jacobson v. Massachusetts, on October 3, 2022 the US Supreme Court denied The Control Group’s petition for writ of certiorari. So this health freedom case is now closed, because four Supreme Court Justices were unwilling to come together to hear our case to provide a civil remedy for the American people against Big Pharma and government vaccine mandates.
We are disappointed the Federal courts completely ignored our unvaccinated control group’s statistically verified evidence (presented with above 99% confidence) that unvaccinated Americans are over 1,200% healthier than vaccinated Americans. As CDC schedule vaccines cause over 90% of chronic illness today in vaccinated people, and as courts turn their backs on the unvaccinated, where can the American people turn for the enforcement of basic rights? How much longer will human sacrifice be “legal” so long as the weapon is a vaccine…
Our mathematical proofs are verified: vaccinations are destroying our country. History will vindicate us. The government has only harmed itself by denying rather than atoning.
Practical Solutions and Next Steps. Until there is a great awakening and systemic clearance of Big Pharma’s domination in Washington DC, the American people cannot realistically expect comprehensive relief for health freedom against vaccine mandates. Rather, targeted/narrow lawsuits (i.e., RFRA statutory cases re denials of religious exemptions) will continue to be the ones that gain ground with favorable federal court orders in the current climate. In other words, here are the primary remedies for the unvaccinated today:
Petitioner Joy Garner’s Survey Reports (Filings January 2021)
All Court Documents Filed
A. District Court — First Amended Verified Petition (filed January 25, 2021)
B. District Court — Request for Judicial Notice (Filings December 2020)
C. District Court — Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Filings December 2020)
D. District Court — Government’s Opposition Papers (Filings February 2021)
E. District Court — Petitioner’s Response Papers (Filings February 2021)
F. District Court — Dismissal (February 2021)
G. 9th Circuit Appeals Court — Writ (April 2021 to May 2021)
H. United States Supreme Court — Writ (August 2021 to November 2021)
I. 9th Circuit Appeals Court — Regular Appeal (July 2021 to February 2022)
J. District Court — Motion to Vacate Dismissal and Disqualify Judge (January 2022 to February 2022)
K. U.S. Supreme Court — Petition for Writ of Certiorari (May 2022 to Present)
Overview: The lower court refused to allow the case to proceed to an evidentiary stage definitively proving vaccines are decimating the American population. The DOJ’s strongest argument they could muster is that the scientific evidence proving the American population is being decimated by vaccines would embarrass the political elite in Washington DC. Here is the DOJ’s exact quote, “any suggestion from a court that vaccines are not safe would cause ’embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.’” Opposition Brief, page 16, line 11.
Detail: In February 2021 the lower court dismissed our case on the grounds of standing (i.e., saying we can’t sue the President for the constitutional violations alleged, but rather should sue someone else). One year later, the judge reversed the dismissal order (after plaintiffs pointed out the judge owned approximately $500,000 in vaccine manufacturer stock). But the 9th Circuit appellate court and US Supreme Court declined to allow the case to move forward, claiming the President cannot be held responsible for vaccine mandates.
The President, as chief executive, manages multiple departments handling vaccines and their distribution (such as HHS, US Military, Department of Education, Department of Commerce, Department of Justice). The courts dismissed the entire case without the government ever producing a single expert or any evidence whatsoever. The defense simply argued that the President cannot be held responsible for vaccine mandates by States. Plaintiffs strongly disagreed, because the President is vigorously involved in mandates. The evidence shows the President manages the following across multiple departments: