Living in America, the standard Hitler narrative is clear and simple. It is crafted via countless Hollywood productions, promoted endlessly by cardboard cutout politicians, taught tirelessly in schools now leading the world in the promotion of human and societal devastation.
The Hitler narrative is so ingrained in current public opinion, that it escapes accountability, or any objective examination. It is abundantly clear to anyone who bothers stray beyond the clearly defined no go zones of the Hitler narrative, that there is more to this image of a comic book villain than meets the eye. Such conditions naturally cause thinking people to raise questions. Perhaps the most significant of these questions is, who was Adolf Hitler?
The shadow of Adolf Hitler continues to loom large in the modern world. Indeed, the permanence of the current institutions of global governance, economics, and social convention require his continued relevance. The circus of derision as orchestrated by significant actors on this modern stage continues to pay a twisted homage to the man, as if through merely invoking his name, a kind of moral bonus is accrued.
Currently, the Russian Federation is trotting out every last ounce of political capital they can muster, to paint their latest military adventure in the Ukraine as some type of holy crusade against the reinvented Hitlerian threat. Russia, the invader, is portrayed once more as the victim of the Nazis, a curious condition, since the Ukraine is as far away from National Socialism as one can imagine.
Nazi is of course, the denigrating term for National Socialism, its original meaning akin to American colloquialisms such as hick, or redneck. National Socialists never referred to themselves as Nazis, nor did they ever consider themselves fascists. The correct understanding of National Socialism was simply that, a socialist form of societal organization, designed to promote the success and advancement of its own people.
Fascism is essentially a form of strong man totalitarianism. National Socialism relied on the idea that what was good for Germany and Germans came first. Thus, competition in industry, for example was controlled. The best ideas moved forward, and once a decision was made precious resources were then allocated. Industry was organized as a society within society. There was a final authority, and that was the Leader, but such bears no real similarity to fascist forms of government.
When examining the personal life of Adolf Hitler, it is clear that he was a rather unremarkable man. His long time association with Eva Braun resulted in marriage during the last days of the Reich, something which was apparently important enough to both of them for her to take the harrowing journey to Berlin. Attempts have been made to slander their union, and cast dirt upon their relationship, but her home movies made in the mountains attest to a very different reality than the ones cooked up by the devotees of decrepitude.
Eva Braun and Adolf Hitler both shared a salt of the earth upbringing. Both were somewhat rebellious, but not overly so. Both had to experience much in life to discover themselves, whilst Eva herself was prone to a Germanic darkness typified by the philosophy of Mainlaender, a wild anti-romantic bent rooted in the deepest mystery of life and death, In contrast, Adolf sought to affirm life, and this affirmation was manifest in his interest in art.
Adolf defied the wishes of his father, and sought to study the centuries old fine art of painting. His forays revealed a visual competency, but no real flare for the medium. Had he the time, and correct instruction, he may well have gone on to become a good artist, but his modest inheritance offered him neither the possibility nor the opportunity for continued instruction. The academy focused upon more promising students, yet these forays into painting and draftsmanship actually serve to debunk one of the most persistent rumors surrounding Adolf Hitler, that he was the illegitimate descendent of lecherous Jewish sexual behavior.
Jewish visual art is very similar to Jewish thought. The work is linear, rooted in the identification and definition of specific elements. Such is the nature of the painting of Kandinsky, Chagall, as well as fundamental to the modern intellectualism of Bansky.
Those who assert a Jewish ancestry for Adolf Hitler have apparently never studied any of his work. Hitler’s portfolio reveals early exploration into light and perspective, an approach to visual subject matter as a holistic impression that is decoded in a non-linear and relationship oriented thinking. In short, the approach of Adolf Hitler to the art of painting was decidedly non-Jewish. Exactly how someone can be under a Jewish identity, and yet show no propensity for that identity in anything as natural and unedited as one’s art is something the conspiracy theorists have yet to address.
Further, there is no proof that Adolf Hitler ever received any preferential treatment, from the Jewish community or anyone else. Certainly his military service was primarily as a courier, one tasked with delivering orders and messages from the headquarters to junior officers at the front. Corporal Hitler was decorated for bravery, and wounded twice.
The Jewish community has made every effort to discredit this military service, and to attribute an onset of mental illness resulting from such wounds. Prominent Jews, such as Kissinger, have portrayed German unification during the late 1930s as the product of a distorted mind. They profess to understand that such insanity is useful in the realm of international politics.
History reveals that the goals of National Socialism were clearly articulated, becoming a template for all German foreign policy. It was this policy which cemented an alliance with Imperial Japan, one Germany never retreated from. It was this policy which maintained the continuity of the Franco government in Spain, and which deployed Otto Skorzeny and his Commandoes to retrieve the body of Mussolini, Hitler’s’ personal friend. Indeed, an observant student of history might conclude that the unhinged nature of Kissinger’s’ foreign policy was due entirely to the madness within himself. The forced destruction of the Allende government, and its replacement by the genocidal Pinochet regime, cannot be blamed upon Germany or Adolf Hitler. 300,000 “disappeared persons” is the result of Kissinger policy, and his alone.
Adolf Hitler and National Socialism were propelled into power by the work of the “Allies” themselves. It was Russia that sent communist agents into Germany to foment a takeover and breakup of what was left of the country after the ravages of WW1, the treaty of Versailles, and the forced removal of the Kaiser. It was France that invaded the Ruhr, and beat up German citizens who attempted to keep the factories open. It was Britain who sent Aleister Crowley to Berlin, an amateur artist at the time, who was famously given to moral turpitude. It was the USA who sent John Bullet to Europe, as special envoy to FDR, who has left a largely unreported history of persistently agitating for war. Germany was very much on the minds of the western world during the so-called between the wars decades. It would be a grave error to adopt the official historic perspective, which posits a condition by which Germany existed in isolation, a victim of its own loss in WW1.
The rise of National Socialism to prominence in post WW1 Germany was never a simple political event. While it is true that this phenomenon is treated by most histories with a disapproving air, such knee jerk value judgments ignore the brutal and chaotic conditions rampant at that time. The Weimar Republic was hardly a government capable of dealing with the challenges brought by the many destructive forces unleashed in Germany. Their abandonment of the German people, and subsequent embracing of the very forces that were oppressing Germany lead to catastrophic conditions for the people. Certainly the time was right for the entry of a charismatic leader, and a political and economic system that restored a sense of order and prosperity.
It is comfortable today to condemn the brutal and cathartic moments of violence associated with National Socialism. Such a position ignores the violence and corruption that has long surrounded the political processes of the west, not to mention the rest of the world, and continues to do so today. Violence and corruption have long traditions in every society. One need look no further than the January 6th debacle, or the Covid scare to find fresh examples in American current events. This violent catharsis within German politics of the time must be seen in light of poorly reported upon conditions present in Germany. Understanding begins to dawn when we cast our gaze to the year 1916, as WW1 raged.
The Kaiser proposed a generous peace offer in 1916. What made this effort noteworthy was the willingness to return borders to pre-war conditions, and for Germany to cease all hostilities. The actual negotiations were to be held by the Vatican, a proposal that encouraged the Pope to offer his own peace initiative a year later, once the Kaisers’ plan had been rejected.
The Kaiser plan was made public while Germany was winning the war. What was most notable concerning this plan was how and why it was rejected. At this point, it need be said that what follows is absolutely controversial. The full implications and assertions here are not going to be debated in this piece, for the reason that the substance of what follows was generally believed to be true in post WW1 Germany. The abrahamic religions have successfully proven that belief is a powerful motivator to human behavior, and it has long been established as true that the prevailing belief in Germany was that they were betrayed, and this betrayal was central to Germany’s defeat in the Great War.
The Kaiser plan was reportedly quite attractive to certain circles in Britain and France. It was so attractive that the forces that wanted to see the war continue were mobilized. Thus the international Jewish community worked to convince the allies that if they would stay in the war, they would achieve victory through the entry of the USA. The USA, already heavily invested in illegally supplying munitions and other means of support to the allied cause, was headed by the bankers’ choice, president Woodrow Wilson. Wilson had already proven his willingness to act via the creation of the Federal Reserve in the final hours of the 1913 congress, a blatantly unconstitutional act that is associated with the extremely questionable 16th and 17th amendments. Wilson’s success in betraying the American people simply had to be tapped into again, and the US army began preparing for its’ first ever expeditionary force into Europe.
The actions of Jews in regards to Germany, of which manipulating the USA into war was but one, were interpreted by Germans as bald faced efforts to defeat the Fatherland in the war, and most certainly created a powder keg in German society. Ignoring this condition is quite convenient for official history, as it allows for a smear campaign against country and people that continues to this day. However, once understood, it is quite clear how a gifted speaker, promising a restoration of honour, the end of the abominable treaty of Versailles, the punishment of communists and traitors, and the ignition of the destiny of the German race rose quite quickly to prominence in the psyche of the people.
Seen thus, Adolf Hitler moved from a rather quiet existence into the limelight of history. He ceased being a citizen of a country, and became an international figure whose legacy is looted and defiled to this day. From this point on, who Adolf Hitler was becomes inextricable from the flow of events, and in a sense the person no longer truly exists. Hitler as a symbol, a figurehead, continues in undiminished power across the world. Like all symbols, Adolf Hitler says more about those who invoke him and deploy his symbol for their own purposes than it does about the man himself.
Those who are most interested in conventional history, and choose to see events in the world as the result of various streams of free will and choice interacting together should probably stop reading at this point. They can be content with the image of a man in a remarkable time, who accomplished remarkable things, with very little preparation or experience. All this is true of course in its own fashion, yet it is hardly the complete story. For those of sterner stuff, the meat will now be set upon the table.
In order to understand what follows next, one must be versed in at least a few baisic tenets of the Aryan world view. This world view is ancient beyond belief, compared to which modern belief systems are mere upstarts. The first and most essential understanding is that time is a series of cycles. Linear time is a convenient method for organizing daily activity, but linear time exists within cycles great and small, and these cycles are born, wax, and pass only to be recreated anew. This symphony of time reveals itself through a system of recurring ages, ages which consistently deteriorate until the final and most disastrous age is reached, which some call Ragnarok.
The second and perhaps equally important tenet to understand is that all of existence is divided between the visible, the image, and the invisible, the intelligible. The image is everything one is used to dealing with in a material environment. Thus, when considering the Sun, for example, there is the visible sun that is the day bringer, the heat and light of our existence, yet there is also an invisible sun that can be recognized by the mind, yet never seen by the eyes.
Therefore, an entire expansive hidden world interpenetrates ours, and it is this hidden world that is the source for the visible one. The ancient Aryan view of existence is that the divine, the spiritual walks hand in hand with this visible one. From time to time this connection becomes obvious due to significant events, and due to the rise of significant people.
In the life of Adolf Hitler, we discover both conditions being met. So it was that in the Aryan understanding, Hitler was not simply an ordinary man who seized an opportunity. He was in fact, an expression of that sense of destiny implicit in the Aryan view of time.
Most likely it is here that readers will find their easiest introduction into an image of who Hitler truly was. A man of humble origins, who discovered an unknown ability to plumb the depths of language and become a dynamic and inspirational speaker, this man from nowhere conveyed ideas and perspectives that captured the imagination of intellectuals and laborers, aristocrats and the impoverished, children and the elderly. It is practically impossible to imagine a wounded war veteran suddenly thrust into such a spotlight, shine with such intensity. Yet this was exactly what occurred.
The temptation of the modern mind, conditioned as it is by unsupported supposition dressing up as truth, is to denigrate this obvious transformation. Yet if speaking was all Adolf Hitler managed to accomplish, then it might be possible to put some stock into a notion of mere latent ability; however the reason we are even discussing the man is due to the incredible transformation, not only in himself, but that which he brought to Germany.
Endless efforts have been made to discredit the achievements of National Socialism societally, psychologically, and economically. Ancient Aryan wisdom has been smeared as Satanism. The entire question of identity has been divorced from language, and been allowed to be savaged by the accomplices to devastation, as I have written previously in National Socializing.
If one were to take a cold rational gaze at the miraculous rebirth of a nation, a people, and the restoration of the legitimate government, one might actually conclude that something divine had just occurred, especially since all this happened despite the oppressive and heavy handed attempts of the international community to prevent it.
The touch of destiny, of Wyrd, echoes again with the 1889 painting depicting Adolf Hitler as Wotan of the Wild Hunt. Created in the very year of Adolf Hitler’s birth, the painting carries an eerie familiarity of the features of the mature future leader. Franz Stuck was well received when unveiling his prophetic work, and whilst he had no idea of the true significance of his art, Germany remembered this painting, and the recognition of the ancient Aryan view of the cosmos was thence rekindled.
The wild hunt is a topic of such breadth and mystery that entire volumes have been dedicated to its study. The origins of this aerial phenomenon are firmly rooted in the pre-christian past. It is beyond the scope of this brief dissertation to truly explore the mysticism, spirituality, and mythic nature of the Wild Hunt, which was the chosen title of the piece. Suffice it to say that the Wild Hunt lives deep in the Aryan psyche, is linked to a unique weather pattern, the dead, and the ancient Gods.
Doubtless the existence of such an intriguing connection is extremely troubling to the propagandists who create official narratives. However it is true that the official narrative cannot explain the miraculous regeneration of Germany. The official narrative cannot explain how an average man, untutored and mangled by war, managed to become perhaps the greatest orator of his time. Here it is important to note that oratory and persuasive speech were skills taught and treasured in classical education. Such skills were so important that the prospective leaders of society were carefully trained over periods of years to attain mastery. Adolf Hitler received no such instruction. Today, no one can explain the Franz Stuck painting. It is simply a fact that Adolf Hitler was born into a mystical milieu. He never cultivated it, or crassly promoted it, as did his contemporary, Stalin. He never had to. Thus the esteemed title of Avatar certainly fits. Interestingly, there was at least one other contemporaneous case of an individual who also exhibited the qualities of an Avatar. Doubtless the two Avatars never formally met, yet as mysterious events go, they describe their times.
The evolution from humble man to orator and from orator to leader of a nation, and from leader of a nation to a mythic figure who continues to represent the deepest mysteries of the Aryan weltanschauung necessarily carries with it a central esotericism. Certainly the question who Adolf Hitler was very much depends upon the time of his life that one chooses to focus upon. That he was aware of destiny operating in his life was all but certain, for in one of his wartime addresses to the German people he stated that if Germany did not overcome, it would be destroyed. Looking around today, Germany is forced to endure unending non-European immigration. The current government was designed by and for occupation forces, an occupation which continues to this day. The birth rate of Germans is plummeting. German industry is hindered by media circus terrorist attacks which are hinted at by the occupation’s sitting president, and the people are literally forced to send a significant portion of their productive hard work to entities who claim to be Germany’s victims. The Germany of today bears little resemblance to that nation that pulled itself out of devastation in the 1930s. The fact that it has survived in any form is actually quite incredible.
The esoteric phenomena that surround and define Adolf Hitler are in themselves discomfiting to those in high places today. Such phenomena speak to a reality that truly does exist, one that follows its own rules, and is utterly outside of their control. It may well be that during those in-between moments it dawns on them that cyclic time, with its own sense of destiny, is far more powerful than they, and that in every cycle that which was will in fact come again, but this time with a knowledge all the wiser than in the previous manifestation, with a power and presence to make the current rulers tremble in terror before they fall.